Break the deadlock with litigation insurance for shareholder disputes
Litigation Insurance can be used for shareholder disputes. Clients may be concerned about acts by majority shareholders which they perceive to be prejudicial to their interests in the value of their shares in the business. Common areas of dispute include deadlock situations, exclusion from management, abuse of power, lack of effort and misuse or misappropriation of company assets.
We have considerable experience and expertise in shareholder disputes and partner with a number of leading litigators across the country.
Our products can enable claims to proceed which might not previously have gone ahead and provide access to justice for a wider range of commercial clients.
Shareholder dispute case types include
- Section 994 Petitions
- Just and equitable winding up
- Derivative actions
- Contract Disputes
The Temple Advantage
Our experience of shareholder disputes is considerable and our reputation for excellent service is second-to-none. The products we offer reflect our commitment to listening to our clients and providing effective insurance to enable your clients to pursue good claims knowing we are carrying the risk that if they are unsuccessful, we will pay the other side’s costs and their own disbursements.
- Litigation insurance for shareholder disputes is available to claimants and defendants alike
- Both Damages and non-Damages claims can be insured
- No upfront cost of obtaining litigation insurance – and also we do not charge an assessment fee
- Payment of the premium is deferred until the conclusion of the case and is contingent on a successful outcome.
- Insured clients will have access to disbursement funding from Temple Funding, a subsidiary of Temple Legal Protection. This can be used to fund, without risk to your client, the court issue fee, expert reports and mediation.
Getting the timing right
The litigation insurance policy is purchased after a legal dispute arises.
The best time to send a case to us is as soon as you are reasonably able to assess the merits of the claim. Usually, this is after your investigation and the pre-action correspondence has been completed, and before proceedings are issued. However, cases can be referred to us at any stage.
Your questions answered
Traditional legal expenses insurance is often known as Before-The-Event or ‘BTE’ cover. Litigation insurance for shareholder disputes used by solicitors is commonly known as After-The-Event or ATE insurance. The latter is the technically correct term but your clients may better understand ‘litigation insurance’. Whichever terminology you prefer, is a bespoke policy put in place with the specific objective of protecting your client from having to pay the opponent’s costs and their own disbursements if their shareholder dispute is unsuccessful.
No. Our products and services are available regardless of the type of retainer you have with your client.
Ideally we would see a copy of an expert report at the outset, but it is not a prerequisite for a proposal to be made. There are many cases we review where an expert report is not available early on in the case, and it will be produced later.
Not at the outset. It is always helpful to see counsel’s opinion if it’s available but not essential. Ideally, we would like a case summary from you – to include the background facts of the case, your assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the case, how any weaknesses might be overcome, and your overall view of the merits.
Contact our experts
If you would like more information on our litigation insurance and disbursement funding products for shareholder disputes, or you have any other legal expenses insurance query, please email email@example.com or call me on 01483 514424. We look forward to hearing from you.
David is the Deputy Underwriting Manager in Temple’s Commercial Department who partners with solicitors and brokers to provide litigation (ATE) insurance and funding solutions to businesses and individuals.
Having started his career in ATE insurance in 2006 at FirstAssist, David gained experience in litigation funding as an analyst at Burford Capital, before joining Temple Legal Protection in late 2013. Having worked for over 12 years in this evolving market, David knows what drives customers and he understands that it is how well you connect with the people you are trying to help that makes you succeed.
David has helped hundreds of customers and has worked with many of the leading law firms in the British Isles. He has extensive and varied experience in risk analysis, case management and long-term relationship management. One of David’s specialisms is his management of our fully-delegated schemes, a responsibility which plays an integral part in the retention of Temple’s partnerships with many leading and specialist commercial law firms.
In his role as Deputy Underwriting Manager, David considers a very wide variety of non-injury litigation including all types of commercial litigation, group actions, professional negligence cases, insolvency actions and contentious probate. He combines strategic activities - evaluating developments such as the impact of ADR on the commercial litigation sector – with expert underwriting in order to assist customers in making efficient and timely use of our litigation (ATE) insurance and funding products.
He continues to work towards his qualifications as a member of the Chartered Insurance Institute.