This is another clinical negligence case type where Temple has considerable experience and many cases are currently insured with us.
These are relatively high value cases that require significant cover to establish the additional expenditure required in raising a disabled child. We understand that whilst such a cases fall within the Clinical Negligence genre there are import differences.
We have expertise in assisting clinical negligence lawyers with these sensitive cases. We say sensitive because the issue in most cases will be that the parent or parents now have a child which was unplanned and feel that they should be compensated. Not all such cases are likely to succeed and we can look at this in a bit more detail below.
It is not always clear at inception whether breach will attach and it is expected that the solicitor will have obtained full copies of the hospital records to try and assess prospects before a referral is requested.
Whether or not liability is likely to attach will involve reviewing the case alongside what are viewed as arguably the three key authorities:
McFarlane: The husband underwent a vasectomy. Unfortunately the procedure was unsuccessful and the couple became parents to a healthy child. The House of Lords held that, although damages for the pain and suffering of pregnancy and childbirth could be awarded, the costs of rearing the child were irrecoverable.
Apply the now familiar three-stage test propounded by Lord Bridge of Harwich in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605;
“Decide that reference to principles of distributive justice might provide a more just solution to the problem than an approach founded solely on principles of corrective justice.: [26]”
“The important thing to note is that there is no longer a single “correct” test”.
Parkinson: This case differs somewhat from McFarlane. The child in this case had been conceived and born due to negligent sterilisation. The child was not healthy as in McFarlane and instead was born with disabilities (such disabilities were not connected to the negligence). The Court of Appeal reiterated that the costs of rearing a healthy child must fail as in McFarlane but here allowed recovery of the extra costs associated with rearing a child with disabilities.
Rees: In this House of Lords case the Claimant was a disabled woman who had elected to have a sterilisation operation because of the difficulties her disability would cause her in raising children. The sterilisation was performed negligently and resulted in the birth of a healthy child. The House of Lords determined that Rees was more in line with McFarlane than Parkinson and so the costs of rearing the child were irrecoverable. There was an award of a lump sum ‘conventional award’ permitted to reflect the legal wrong suffered by the Claimant. As suggested by the description this is an award which may not reflect actual loss but one which it has been thought appropriate to make.
If breach can be established as far as possible and the solicitor is satisfied that the parent or parents would have chosen not to go through with the birth in their particular circumstances then the instruction of experts to establish liability then follows. The cover we offer means you can be sure of our support, even though settlement may not be approved for many years.
The ATE insurance cover Temple offer can also include integrated disbursement funding to claimants for court fees, expert reports and mediator fees. This helps ‘unlock’ the claim and puts a claimant in the position of being able to pursue their claim.
For complex cases, our experienced team provides quick, commercial decisions to get your funding in place.
As a Corporate Chartered Underwriting Agent, we operate to the highest professional and ethical standards in the UK.
Backed by Intact Insurance UK Limited, providing global financial strength for your peace of mind.
Access the technical documents and application forms you need to secure ATE insurance and disbursement funding for your clients
Our specialist clinical negligence underwriters are ready to review your case or discuss a delegated authority scheme for your firm today.
Prefer to reach out directly?
Some of the key questions about wrongful birth cases.